Barillas v. CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
This text of Barillas v. CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company (Barillas v. CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 LEOPOLDO BARILLAS, et al., 11 Case No.: 2:20-cv-00829-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 12 ORDER v. 13 [Docket No. 10] CSAA FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE 14 COMPANY, 15 Defendant(s). 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 10. The 17 discovery plan seeks several extra months for the discovery period so that counsel can concentrate 18 on a backlog of cases they contend was created by pandemic-related restrictions. Id. at 2. The 19 most fundamental flaw with this contention is that it appears to be cut-and-pasted from a discovery 20 plan submitted by counsel in another case that was flatly rejected a few weeks ago. Briseno v. 21 Ortega, Case No.: 2:20-cv-00680-GMN-NJK, Docket No. 26 (D. Nev. June 17, 2020). Courts do 22 not look kindly on the repetition of a rejected argument without any acknowledgment of the 23 previous order or any explanation why the previous order should not control. E.g. Atlantis Enters. 24 v. Avon Prods., 2010 WL 11519593, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2010) (quoting United States CFTC 25 v. Lake Shore Asset Mgmt., 540 F. Supp. 2d 994, 1015 (N.D. Ill. 2008)). The requested discovery 26 period in this case is rejected for the reasons already provided in Briseno. 27 In addition, despite a previous order identifying the local rules violation to defense counsel, 28 the discovery plan incorrectly calculates the discovery period from the Rule 26(f) conference 1] instead of the date of the answer. See Docket No. 10 at 3; but see Briseno, Docket No. 26 at 1 & n.1 (citing Local Rule 26-1(b)(1)). 3 Accordingly, the pending discovery plan is DENIED. An amended discovery plan must Al be filed by July 28, 2020. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: July 22, 2020 he. Nancy J. Koppe) □ 8 United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barillas v. CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barillas-v-csaa-fire-casualty-insurance-company-nvd-2020.