Barile v. Lenscrafters, Inc., No. Cv 041-50-48 (Aug. 21, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Barile v. Lenscrafters, Inc., No. Cv 041-50-48 (Aug. 21, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 11291

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedAugust 21, 2001

DocketNo. CV 041-50-48

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 11291 (Barile v. Lenscrafters, Inc., No. Cv 041-50-48 (Aug. 21, 2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barile v. Lenscrafters, Inc., No. Cv 041-50-48 (Aug. 21, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 11291 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Defendant seller's Motion for Summary Judgment (133).

Defendant Lenscrafters, Inc. Motion for Summary Judgment (137).

Both defendants moved that judgments enter in their favor as plaintiff failed to file opposing affidavits to their respective motions for summary judgment.

Courts exhibits 1, 2, and 3 support these claims of defendants and are proof that plaintiff failed to file affidavits mandated by P.B. § 17-45.Inwood Condominium Assn. v. Winer, 49 Conn. App. 694, 697-698 (1998).

Hughes v. Bemer, 200 Conn. 400, 402-403 (1986) addresses a collateral practice book mandates. CT Page 11292

"The memorandum must be filed or the motion XXX shall be granted."

Judgment for defendants on each motion.

John N. Reynolds Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI