Barger v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Barger v. State

139 So. 909, 25 Ala. App. 600

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1932

Docket6 Div. 183.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 909 (Barger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barger v. State, 139 So. 909, 25 Ala. App. 600 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment of this appellant, defendant in tbe court below, be entered a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment; the offense being that of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, vinous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol. The jury, upon defendant’s plea of guilty, returned a verdict accordingly, whereupon the court imposed an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. The term so fixed was practically the minimum term provided by law, but notwithstanding the defendant took an appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered. This appeal is manifestly for delay, as no points of decision are presented. The record is regular. Judgment of the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon arraignment of this appellant, defendant in tbe court below, be entered a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment; the offense being that of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, vinous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol. The jury, upon defendant’s plea of guilty, returned a verdict accordingly, whereupon the court imposed an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. The term so fixed was practically the minimum term provided by law, but notwithstanding the defendant took an appeal from the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered. This appeal is manifestly for delay, as no points of decision are presented. The record is regular. Judgment of the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 909, 25 Ala. App. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barger-v-state-alactapp-1932.