Bargeman v. State
This text of 88 S.E. 591 (Bargeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In a criminal ease in which the defendant makes no statement at the trial, it is not error for the court to fail to instruct the jury that that fact should not be considered by them in determining as to the guilt or the innocence of the accused, where there is no request for such an instruction.
' 2. The conviction of the accused not depending wholly upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err) in the absence of a timely written request, in failing to charge the law of circumstantial evidence.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 591, 17 Ga. App. 807, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bargeman-v-state-gactapp-1916.