Barge v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barge v. State

70 S.E. 965, 9 Ga. App. 226, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 480

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1911

Docket3210

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E. 965 (Barge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barge v. State, 70 S.E. 965, 9 Ga. App. 226, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

I-Iiix, C. J.

1. This court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to allow the attorney for the movant further time in which to amend' the motion for a new trial, unless it clearly appears that such discretion was manifestly abused. In the present ease there was no abuse of discretion.

2. No error of law appears, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I-Iiix, C. J.

1. This court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to allow the attorney for the movant further time in which to amend' the motion for a new trial, unless it clearly appears that such discretion was manifestly abused. In the present ease there was no abuse of discretion.

2. No error of law appears, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed,.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E. 965, 9 Ga. App. 226, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barge-v-state-gactapp-1911.