Barge v. State

59 S.E. 192, 3 Ga. App. 20, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 539
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1907·No. 770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Por the trial judge to state, in the hearing of the jury on the trial of a criminal ease, that if the defendant did not put in any evidence he would direct a verdict against the defendant, is manifest error, and imperatively requires the grant of a new trial, however conclusive the evidence establishing guilt. Penal Code, § 1032.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barge v. State, 59 S.E. 192, 3 Ga. App. 20, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

59 S.E. 192 (Barge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State
18 S.E.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)