Barge v. State

915 So. 2d 705, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18655, 2005 WL 3143437
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2005·No. No. 1D05-1294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court erred in relying on the clerk’s docket as part of the record, Clark v. State, 851 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA [706]*7062003), the summary denial of the appellant’s postconviction motion is affirmed because the motion is facially insufficient. State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barge v. State, 915 So. 2d 705, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18655, 2005 WL 3143437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 705 (Barge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Clark v. State
851 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)