Barge v. Irwin

60 S.E. 1014, 4 Ga. App. 84, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 213
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 30, 1908·No. 774·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

A verdict for the plaintiff was authorized, under the law and the evidence; but the amount of the jury’s finding was greater than authorized by the evidence, there being no evidence to authorize 'the recovery of exemplary damages. It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be affirmed, on condition that the defendant in error reduce the judgment in her favor to the sum of $7.32, the actual damages shown. Upon failure to do this the judgment refusing a new trial is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barge v. Irwin, 60 S.E. 1014, 4 Ga. App. 84, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 213 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 1014 (Barge v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.