Barfoot v. Willis
178 N.C. 200
Opinion
The admissions contained in the judgment clearly show that the attempted entry is unauthorized and of no legal effect.
The water, being navigable, was not the subject of entry (Rev., sec. 1693) except by the.riparian owner for wharfage purposes (Rev., sec. 1696), and-the enterer is not a riparian owner.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barfoot v. Willis, 178 N.C. 200 (N.C. 1919).
178 N.C. 200 (Barfoot v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capune v. Robbins
160 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)