Barfield v. State

30 S.E. 743, 105 Ga. 491, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 602
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 24, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. Failure by tbe judge on the trial of a criminal case to'allude in his charge to the statement of the accused will not require the granting of a new trial, when there was no request to charge upon this subject and the omission to do so resulted in no injury to the accused. Brassell v. State, 64 Ga. 318; Bray v. State, 69 Ga. 765; Seyden v. State, 78 Ga. 106; Underwood v. State, 88 Ga. 51. The case of Doster v. State, 93 Ga. 43, is in some respects not precisely applicable to the present case, but the opinion therein (pp. 44, 45) recognizes the correctness of what is above laid down.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the record discloses no cause for granting a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barfield v. State, 30 S.E. 743, 105 Ga. 491, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 602 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 743 (Barfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knopp v. State
3 S.E.2d 140 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Culver v. State
124 Ga. 822 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)