Barfield v. State
719 So. 2d 1010, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882, 1998 WL 765363
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 1998·No. No. 97-4038·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgments of conviction for burglary and petit theft in all respects but remand for correction of the judgments to reflect that appellant was found guilty of these offenses following a jury trial, rather than a guilty plea, and that his petit theft conviction is a second degree misdemeanor.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of judgments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barfield v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882, 1998 WL 765363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
719 So. 2d 1010 (Barfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. State
719 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)