Barfield v. State
719 So. 2d 1010, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882, 1998 WL 765363
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 4, 1998
DocketNo. 97-4038
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 719 So. 2d 1010 (Barfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barfield v. State, 719 So. 2d 1010, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882, 1998 WL 765363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgments of conviction for burglary and petit theft in all respects but remand for correction of the judgments to reflect that appellant was found guilty of these offenses following a jury trial, rather than a guilty plea, and that his petit theft conviction is a second degree misdemeanor.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of judgments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Young v. State
719 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
719 So. 2d 1010, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882, 1998 WL 765363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barfield-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.