Barfield v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Barfield v. Southern Railway Co.

45 S.E. 282, 118 Ga. 256, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 518

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 30, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 282 (Barfield v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barfield v. Southern Railway Co., 45 S.E. 282, 118 Ga. 256, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 518 (Ga. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Cobb, J.

When this ease was here before (115 Ga. 724), it was held that the plaintifi was not entitled to recover, because it affirmatively appeared from his own testimony that he could by the exercise of ordinary care have avoided the injuries for which he sued. The evidence in the present case is substantially the same as that in the record of the previous case, and there-was therefore no error in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

By jive Jutices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb, J.

When this ease was here before (115 Ga. 724), it was held that the plaintifi was not entitled to recover, because it affirmatively appeared from his own testimony that he could by the exercise of ordinary care have avoided the injuries for which he sued. The evidence in the present case is substantially the same as that in the record of the previous case, and there-was therefore no error in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

By jive Jutices.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 S.E. 282, 118 Ga. 256, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barfield-v-southern-railway-co-ga-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack