Barfield v. Kay

140 So. 3d 703, 2014 WL 2616493
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2014
DocketNo. 5D14-716
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 703 (Barfield v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barfield v. Kay, 140 So. 3d 703, 2014 WL 2616493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Todd Barfield appeals the summary denial of his motion to vacate or modify an injunction for protection against repeat violence entered in favor of Ranee Kay. We reverse.

Section 784.046(10), Florida Statutes (2013), allows a court to modify or dissolve an injunction at any time on the motion of an interested party. Likewise, Florida Rule of Family Procedure 12.610(6) allows an injunction to be modified or vacated under specified circumstances. In either event, due process requires that Barfield is entitled to a hearing. See McFarr v. McKee, 83 So.3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McFarr v. McKee Ex Rel. J.M.
83 So. 3d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 703, 2014 WL 2616493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barfield-v-kay-fladistctapp-2014.