Barenblatt v. United States

Supreme Court

Barenblatt v. United States

356 U.S. 929, 78 S. Ct. 771, 2 L. Ed. 2d 760, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1245

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 14, 1958·No. No. 787·Published

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and motion [930] to use the record in Barenblatt v. United States, No. 742, October Term, 1956 [354 U. S. 930], are granted. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and motion.

Edward J. Ennis, Osmond K. Fraenkel, Barent Ten Eyck and David Scribner for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and motion [930] to use the record in Barenblatt v. United States, No. 742, October Term, 1956 [354 U. S. 930], are granted. Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and motion.

Edward J. Ennis, Osmond K. Fraenkel, Barent Ten Eyck and David Scribner for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States.

Barenblatt v. United States, 356 U.S. 929, 78 S. Ct. 771, 2 L. Ed. 2d 760, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1245 (1958).

Pincite

356 U.S. 929 (Barenblatt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related