Barenblatt v. Massachusetts Accident Co.

155 Misc. 594, 280 N.Y.S. 414, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1232
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 8, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 Misc. 594 (Barenblatt v. Massachusetts Accident Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barenblatt v. Massachusetts Accident Co., 155 Misc. 594, 280 N.Y.S. 414, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1232 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The misrepresentation by an applicant for health and accident insurance as to the receipt by him of prior disability benefits is material as a matter of law. Since there is [595]*595no issue raised as to the falsity of such representation, the defendant insurance company is entitled to summary judgment in an action for disability payments.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits granted.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirschner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
157 Misc. 635 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 Misc. 594, 280 N.Y.S. 414, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barenblatt-v-massachusetts-accident-co-nyappterm-1935.