Barela v. United States

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JENNIFER RENEE BARELA, Movant, vs. No. CV 19-00269 KG/KBM No. CR 17-01878 KG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER OF REFERENCE RELATING TO PRISONER CASES In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. The Magistrate Judge will analyze, among other things, whether Movant’s claims should be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). (See CV Docs. 10, 11, 12). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. sdhnltognss UNITED STATES DISTRIC? JUDGE