Barefoot v. Thorton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 15, 2007·No. 07-6727·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6727

CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIMMY THORTON; JOHN CORNLEY, Chief Deputy; KEM PICKETT, Captain; GEORGE DEWEY HUDSON, JR., District Attorney, Sampson County; JAMIE B. ASKINS, Assistant District Attorney; JAMES FREEMAN, Assistant District Attorney; LIEUTENANT SILVESTER WILSON; MARVIN POLK; KEVIN JOHN MCREAINY; EARL BUTLER; DONNIE HARRISON; W. STVEDA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03109-H)

Submitted: August 3, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr. appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Barefoot v. Thorton, No. 5:06-ct-03109-H

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barefoot v. Thorton, (4th Cir. 2007).

Barefoot v. Thorton (Barefoot v. Thorton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related