Barefoot v. Rulnick
113 S.E.2d 921, 252 N.C. 483, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584
Opinion
The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barefoot v. Rulnick, 113 S.E.2d 921, 252 N.C. 483, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584 (N.C. 1960).
113 S.E.2d 921 (Barefoot v. Rulnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bright
118 S.E.2d 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)