Barefoot v. Revell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6695

CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SARAH REVELL; ERIC HOLDER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-hc-02091-D)

Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., a federal pre-trial

detainee, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition and the

order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barefoot v.

Revell, No. 5:09-hc-02091-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2010; Apr. 5,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED