Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Barefoot Mailman Ltd. v. Barkheimer

Barefoot Mailman Ltd. v. Barkheimer

462 So. 2d 1125, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1984
DocketNos. 83-311, 83-1004
StatusPublished

This text of 462 So. 2d 1125 (Barefoot Mailman Ltd. v. Barkheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barefoot Mailman Ltd. v. Barkheimer, 462 So. 2d 1125, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank, 252 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971) and Sherman v. Field Clinic, 74 Ill.App.3d 21, 29 Ill.Dec. 597, 392 N.E.2d 154 (1979).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank
252 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Sherman v. Field Clinic
392 N.E.2d 154 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 1125, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barefoot-mailman-ltd-v-barkheimer-fladistctapp-1984.