Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.
549 So. 2d 1157, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1989 WL 118962
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1989
DocketNo. 89-973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 549 So. 2d 1157 (Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1157, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1989 WL 118962 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
This case is controlled by Tinwood, N. V. v. Figueredo, 523 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), where we held that a trial court lacks authority to transfer only a portion of a pending action to another jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McClure v. Painewebber, Inc.
549 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
549 So. 2d 1157, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1989 WL 118962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bared-co-v-hughes-supply-inc-fladistctapp-1989.