Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.
549 So. 2d 1157, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1989 WL 118962
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1989·No. No. 89-973·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This case is controlled by Tinwood, N. V. v. Figueredo, 523 So.2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), where we held that a trial court lacks authority to transfer only a portion of a pending action to another jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1157, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2372, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1989 WL 118962 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
549 So. 2d 1157 (Bared & Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McClure v. Painewebber, Inc.
549 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)