Bare v. Pennsylvania R.
19 A. 935, 135 Pa. 95, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1154
Opinion
The only matter of which the defendant complains is that the court below refused to instruct the jury that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The opinion of the learned judge in disposing of the reserved question is a sufficient answer to this proposition. We find no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bare v. Pennsylvania R., 19 A. 935, 135 Pa. 95, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1154 (Pa. 1890).
19 A. 935 (Bare v. Pennsylvania R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.
216 P. 735 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)
Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. Neubacher
43 N.E. 576 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1896)