Bardon v. Endejan

1925 OK 572, 237 P. 613, 113 Okla. 39, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 866
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 7, 1925·No. 15602·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By reason of the failure of the defendant in error to file a brief in this case in compliance with rule 7 of this court, and upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bardon v. Endejan, 1925 OK 572, 237 P. 613, 113 Okla. 39, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 866 (Okla. 1925).

1925 OK 572 (Bardon v. Endejan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railroad v. Dodson
1960 OK 230 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)
Squyres v. Klick
1953 OK 294 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1953)
Huggans v. Southern Pacific Co.
207 P.2d 864 (California Court of Appeal, 1949)
Kurn v. Adair
1946 OK 350 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
Carpenter v. Kurn
157 S.W.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1941)
Gypsy Oil Co. v. Colbert
1936 OK 775 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Gwaltney v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
96 S.W.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1936)
Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliams
1934 OK 233 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Gypsy Oil Co. v. Ginn
1931 OK 496 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Graybill v. Clancy
1930 OK 367 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Eakins
1929 OK 563 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Southwest Missouri R. Co. v. Duncan
1929 OK 499 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Wilson v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.
1929 OK 503 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pedigo
1926 OK 118 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Tice
1925 OK 963 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)