Bardo v. Bardo

111 A. 597, 92 N.J. Eq. 230, 7 Stock. 230, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 317
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 111 A. 597 (Bardo v. Bardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bardo v. Bardo, 111 A. 597, 92 N.J. Eq. 230, 7 Stock. 230, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 317 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be .affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion, filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. '.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Swayzé, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A. 597, 92 N.J. Eq. 230, 7 Stock. 230, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bardo-v-bardo-nj-1920.