Bardo v. Bardo

111 A. 597, 92 N.J. Eq. 230, 7 Stock. 230, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 317
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be .affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion, filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. '.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Swayzé, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bardo v. Bardo, 111 A. 597, 92 N.J. Eq. 230, 7 Stock. 230, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 317 (N.J. 1920).

111 A. 597 (Bardo v. Bardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.