Bardo v. Alvarado
This text of Bardo v. Alvarado (Bardo v. Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) KARIM BARDO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1944 (KBJ) ) PETER ALVARADO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 8, 2013, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary
judgment [ECF No. 11]. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and
specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by May 10, 2013, the Court
may treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the
motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the
defendants’ motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: May 28, 2013 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bardo v. Alvarado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bardo-v-alvarado-dcd-2013.