Bardis v. Ubiles

38 A.D.3d 812, 831 N.Y.S.2d 340

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Ricardo Ubiles and Visan Fuel Oil Company, Inc., doing business as Reliable Fuel, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated January 3, 2006, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [813] [1980]; Gregson v Terry, 35 AD3d 358, 361 [2006]). Ritter, J.E, Goldstein, Lifson and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bardis v. Ubiles, 38 A.D.3d 812, 831 N.Y.S.2d 340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 812 (Bardis v. Ubiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Gregson v. Terry
35 A.D.3d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)