Bardes v. Auld
This text of 629 F. App'x 570 (Bardes v. Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 F. App'x 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bardes-v-auld-ca4-2016.