Bardes v. Auld

Fourth Circuit

Bardes v. Auld

629 F. App'x 570

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2016·No. No. 15-2396·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bardes v. Auld, 629 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

629 F. App'x 570 (Bardes v. Auld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related