Barden v. Mosca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barden v. Mosca

266 A.D.2d 390, 698 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11498

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 390 (Barden v. Mosca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barden v. Mosca, 266 A.D.2d 390, 698 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Michael Mosca, the Chief of Police of the City of Mount Vernon Police Department, that the petitioner was not entitled to disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered July 17, 1998, as, upon reargument, granted that branch of the petition which was to annul the determination and direct the respondents to hold an evidentiary hearing, and remitted the matter to the respondents for an evidentiary hearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from a nonfinal order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Simonsen v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 263 AD2d 326). The appellants did not seek leave to appeal and we decline to sua sponte grant leave. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Michael Mosca, the Chief of Police of the City of Mount Vernon Police Department, that the petitioner was not entitled to disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered July 17, 1998, as, upon reargument, granted that branch of the petition which was to annul the determination and direct the respondents to hold an evidentiary hearing, and remitted the matter to the respondents for an evidentiary hearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from a nonfinal order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see, CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Simonsen v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 263 AD2d 326). The appellants did not seek leave to appeal and we decline to sua sponte grant leave. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 390, 698 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barden-v-mosca-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack