Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Barde v. State

Barde v. State

221 So. 3d 657, 2017 WL 2562417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1365
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 2017·No. No. 4D17-1038·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging, if appropriate, that he does not qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender and/or as a prison release reoffen-der. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001); Hampton v. State, 941 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

May, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barde v. State, 221 So. 3d 657, 2017 WL 2562417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1365 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

221 So. 3d 657 (Barde v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Hampton v. State
941 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)