Barde v. State
221 So. 3d 657, 2017 WL 2562417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1365
This text of 221 So. 3d 657 (Barde v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barde v. State, 221 So. 3d 657, 2017 WL 2562417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1365 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging, if appropriate, that he does not qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender and/or as a prison release reoffen-der. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001); Hampton v. State, 941 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Hampton v. State
941 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
221 So. 3d 657, 2017 WL 2562417, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8670, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barde-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.