Bard v. Gluck
113 N.Y.S. 487
This text of 113 N.Y.S. 487 (Bard v. Gluck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bard v. Gluck, 113 N.Y.S. 487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
Opinion
There are many inconsistencies in the evidence submitted on both sides, and notwithstanding that, if the question came to us in the first instance, we might have felt ourselves constrained to find for the defendant, the jury’s verdict should not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 N.Y.S. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bard-v-gluck-nyappterm-1908.