Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
April 13, 2012
ERRATA ______________________
Appeal No. 2010-1510
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. AND DAVID GOLDFARB, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and C.R. BARD, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. Decided: February 10, 2012 Precedential Opinion ______________________
Please make the following change:
Page 34, line 10, delete the following sentences:
“With the same law firm representing Gore both before and after the ’135 patent was issued, the district court viewed the objectivity of the opinion as questionable. Id. at 10.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.