Bard-Parker Co. v. Crescent Surgical Sales Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bard-Parker Co. v. Crescent Surgical Sales Co.

247 A.D. 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 716 (Bard-Parker Co. v. Crescent Surgical Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bard-Parker Co. v. Crescent Surgical Sales Co., 247 A.D. 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, affirmed, with [717]*717ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — MeAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in part: The order should be modified so as to permit the appellants truthfully to state their previous connection with the surgical blades heretofore sold by the plaintiff, and also to permit the appellants truthfully to state that the blades now sold by them are identical, except as to the source of origin of manufacture, with the blades now manufactured by the plaintiff. In other words, the order should be modified to permit the appellants to advertise the truth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, affirmed, with [717]*717ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — MeAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in part: The order should be modified so as to permit the appellants truthfully to state their previous connection with the surgical blades heretofore sold by the plaintiff, and also to permit the appellants truthfully to state that the blades now sold by them are identical, except as to the source of origin of manufacture, with the blades now manufactured by the plaintiff. In other words, the order should be modified to permit the appellants to advertise the truth.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bard-parker-co-v-crescent-surgical-sales-co-nyappdiv-1936.