Barcus v. Rogers

Fourth Circuit

Barcus v. Rogers

119 F. App'x 518

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2005·No. No. 04-7652·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward Barcus appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barcus v. Rogers, No. CA-04-547-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 24, 2004; entered Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Edward Barcus appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barcus v. Rogers, No. CA-04-547-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 24, 2004; entered Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Barcus v. Rogers, 119 F. App'x 518 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

119 F. App'x 518 (Barcus v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related