Barcus v. O'Connell
281 A.D. 1064, 121 N.Y.S.2d 366
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Application for a stay denied, without costs. Petitioner has already had stays which exceed a period of thirty days. The courts are without authority to grant a single stay or successive stays totaling more than thirty days. ’ (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 121; Matter of Yacht Club Catering v. Bruckman, 276 N. Y. 44.) Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barcus v. O'Connell, 281 A.D. 1064, 121 N.Y.S.2d 366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
281 A.D. 1064 (Barcus v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
La Penta v. State Liquor Authority
28 A.D.2d 1206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Rockave Bar & Grill, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
15 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Burack v. STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK
160 F. Supp. 161 (E.D. New York, 1958)