Barcroft v. Paul Winston & Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Barcroft v. Paul Winston & Co.

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 487

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1961·No. No. 37222·Published

Opinion

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Radcliff, Taft, Matthias, Beix., Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J. Radcliff, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Radcliff, Taft, Matthias, Beix., Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J. Radcliff, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

Barcroft v. Paul Winston & Co., 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 487 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 487 (Barcroft v. Paul Winston & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.