BARCLIFT v. KEYSTONE CREDIT SERVICES, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________

PAULETTE BARCLIFT, on behalf of : Herself and others similarly situated, : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 5:21-cv-04335 : KEYSTONE CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, : Defendant. : ____________________________________

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2022, since the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over this case, for the reasons stated in the Court’s February 14, 2022, opinion, see ECF No. 21, and for the reasons stated in the Court’s Opinion issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Amended Complaint, ECF No. 23, is DISMISSED with prejudice.1 2. Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 24, is dismissed as moot. 3. This case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.___________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

1 The Court dismisses the Amended Complaint with prejudice because Barclift had an opportunity to cure her claim’s deficiencies but did not. Any additional amendments would therefore be futile. See Boyd v. New Jersey Dept. of Corrections, 583 Fed. Appx. 30, 32 (3d Cir. 2014).