Barclays Bank Plc v. Franchise Tax Board of California
This text of 510 U.S. 1107 (Barclays Bank Plc v. Franchise Tax Board of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
510 U.S. 1107
Barclays Bank PLC
v.
Franchise Tax Board of California.
No. 92-1384.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
Appeal from the Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 942.]
Motion of California Legislature for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of Government of the United Kingdom for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 U.S. 1107, 114 S. Ct. 1044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclays-bank-plc-v-franchise-tax-board-of-california-scotus-1994.