Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Barclays Bank of New York, National Ass'n v. Jao

Barclays Bank of New York, National Ass'n v. Jao

208 A.D.2d 880, 618 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 880 (Barclays Bank of New York, National Ass'n v. Jao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclays Bank of New York, National Ass'n v. Jao, 208 A.D.2d 880, 618 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action to recover amounts due under a promissory note and a guarantee, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated April 7, 1993, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant demonstrated the existence of a triable issue of fact by submitting evidence that there was an alteration to the guarantee upon which the plaintiff seeks recovery (see, Litwak v Crown Beverages Corp., 133 AD2d 742; Trophy Prods, v Smith, 41 AD2d 817; Tilden Fin. Corp. v Muffoletto, 140 AD2d 603; Himan v King Bear Auto Serv. Ctrs., 62 AD2d 1010, 1011). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trophy Productions, Inc. v. Smith
41 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Himan v. King Bear Auto Service Centers, Inc.
62 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Litwak v. Crown Beverages Corp.
133 A.D.2d 742 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Tilden Financial Corp. v. Muffoletto
140 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 880, 618 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclays-bank-of-new-york-national-assn-v-jao-nyappdiv-1994.