Barclay v. State

100 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1919
Docket10796
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 756 (Barclay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclay v. State, 100 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 631 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the absence of a timely and appropriate written request for more particular instructions upon the law of reasonable doubt, the charge upon that subject as given was sufficient.

2. The 1st and 2d special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely elaboration of the general grounds. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a now trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., ooneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 756, 24 Ga. App. 344, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-state-gactapp-1919.