Barclay v. Minchin

6 Mass. 162
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Mass. 162 (Barclay v. Minchin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclay v. Minchin, 6 Mass. 162 (Mass. 1809).

Opinion

By the Court.

This case contains facts similar in principle to those agreed in the preceding case of Grimshaw vs. Bender & Al. ; and the verdict, which was found for the plaintiffs by consent, subject to the opinion of the Court on a case reserved, must be amended by a calculation of the damages, according to the rule which governed in that case.

The plaintiffs are entitled to have the sterling money mentioned in the bill, and also the charges of protest, reduced to the American currency at par, and to have Massachusetts * in- [ * 163 ] terest on them, from the time the bill was payable to this time ; and also to have one tenth of the bill, with like interest from the time when payment was demanded here and refused. The amount of the several items is to be substituted for the damages found by the verdict, and judgment to be rendered on the verdict accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holyoke v. Clark
54 N.H. 578 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Mass. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-minchin-mass-1809.