Barclay v. Milliken
This text of 251 F.2d 616 (Barclay v. Milliken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
251 F.2d 616
Orville J. BARCLAY, Appellant,
v.
William H. MILLIKEN, Clerk of Court, Media, Pa., William J.
Dunn, Deputy Clerk of Court, Media, Pa., Defendant
Trial Counsel, Philadelphia Bar.
No. 12425.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 6, 1958.
Decided Feb. 12, 1958.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Thomas J. Clary, Judge.
Orville J. Barclay, pro se.
Jacques H. Fox, Asst. Dist. Atty., J. Harold Hughes, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Raymond R. Start, Dist. Atty., Media, Pa., for appellee.
Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed the plaintiff's 'Motion for Injunction.' He petitions this Court to set aside the judgment. We have examined the record and find that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 F.2d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-milliken-ca3-1958.