Barclay v. Culver

66 How. Pr. 342
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 How. Pr. 342 (Barclay v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclay v. Culver, 66 How. Pr. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

I think that the plaintiff is entitled to the full allowance which she claimed on the taxation. The amount of the alleged set-off was, I think, directly involved in the case (Woonsocket Rubber Co. agt. Rubber Clothing Co., supra; Vilmar agt. Sohall, 61 N. Y., 564).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lissberger v. Schoenberg Metal Co.
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 158 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 How. Pr. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-culver-nysupct-1884.