Barclay v. Culver
66 How. Pr. 342
Opinion
I think that the plaintiff is entitled to the full allowance which she claimed on the taxation. The amount of the alleged set-off was, I think, directly involved in the case (Woonsocket Rubber Co. agt. Rubber Clothing Co., supra; Vilmar agt. Sohall, 61 N. Y., 564).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barclay v. Culver, 66 How. Pr. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).
66 How. Pr. 342 (Barclay v. Culver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lissberger v. Schoenberg Metal Co.
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 158 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)