Barclay v. Culver
66 How. Pr. 342
This text of 66 How. Pr. 342 (Barclay v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barclay v. Culver, 66 How. Pr. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).
Opinion
I think that the plaintiff is entitled to the full allowance which she claimed on the taxation. The amount of the alleged set-off was, I think, directly involved in the case (Woonsocket Rubber Co. agt. Rubber Clothing Co., supra; Vilmar agt. Sohall, 61 N. Y., 564).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lissberger v. Schoenberg Metal Co.
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 158 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 How. Pr. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-culver-nysupct-1884.