Barclay v. Citibank, N.A.

54 N.E.3d 1170, 27 N.Y.3d 1077, 35 N.Y.S.3d 298, 2016 NY Slip Op 76436, 2016 WL 3248221, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1696
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 54 N.E.3d 1170 (Barclay v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclay v. Citibank, N.A., 54 N.E.3d 1170, 27 N.Y.3d 1077, 35 N.Y.S.3d 298, 2016 NY Slip Op 76436, 2016 WL 3248221, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1696 (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.E.3d 1170, 27 N.Y.3d 1077, 35 N.Y.S.3d 298, 2016 NY Slip Op 76436, 2016 WL 3248221, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-citibank-na-ny-2016.