Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.

Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.

71 A. 1133, 71 N.J. Eq. 769, 1 Buchanan 769, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 293
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 2, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A. 1133 (Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co., 71 A. 1133, 71 N.J. Eq. 769, 1 Buchanan 769, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 293 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davison v. Duke University
194 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A. 1133, 71 N.J. Eq. 769, 1 Buchanan 769, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barclay-v-charles-roome-parmele-co-nj-1907.