Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.

71 A. 1133, 71 N.J. Eq. 769, 1 Buchanan 769, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 293
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 2, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co., 71 A. 1133, 71 N.J. Eq. 769, 1 Buchanan 769, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 293 (N.J. 1907).

71 A. 1133 (Barclay v. Charles Roome Parmele Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davison v. Duke University
194 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)