Barclay v. Barclay

171 A.D. 892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion that, in view of plaintiff’s special property in the subject-matter of this litigation, she is entitled to an examination of defendant’s books of account and that she is not called upon to accept the defendant’s conclusion as to the results which such an examination would disclose. The order should be so drawn as to interfere as little as possible with the conduct of the business, and to that end will be settled on notice. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., [893]*893McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Order to be settled on notice. _

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barclay v. Barclay, 171 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

171 A.D. 892 (Barclay v. Barclay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Evans, Judge
98 P.2d 703 (Utah Supreme Court, 1940)