Barcia v. Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barcia v. Murdock

2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 708 (Barcia v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barcia v. Murdock, 2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the board of standards and appeals of the City of New York, which granted an application under subdivision (f) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit premises in a business use district to be occupied as a gasoline service station for a period of 15 years, the appeal is from an order granting a motion by the board to vacate an order of certiorari and to dismiss the petition on which it was based, and affirming the determination of the board. Order unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the board of standards and appeals of the City of New York, which granted an application under subdivision (f) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit premises in a business use district to be occupied as a gasoline service station for a period of 15 years, the appeal is from an order granting a motion by the board to vacate an order of certiorari and to dismiss the petition on which it was based, and affirming the determination of the board. Order unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barcia-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1956.