Barcia v. Menna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barcia v. Menna

307 A.D.2d 243, 762 N.Y.S.2d 279

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 2003·Published

Opinion

In an action for partition and an accounting, the defendant Marie Menna appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated March 13, 2002, as granted the plaintiffs motion to compel her to accept the plaintiffs reply to the counterclaims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion to compel the appellant to accept her reply to the counterclaims. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for partition and an accounting, the defendant Marie Menna appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated March 13, 2002, as granted the plaintiffs motion to compel her to accept the plaintiffs reply to the counterclaims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion to compel the appellant to accept her reply to the counterclaims. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Barcia v. Menna, 307 A.D.2d 243, 762 N.Y.S.2d 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

307 A.D.2d 243 (Barcia v. Menna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.