Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp.

180 N.E.2d 919, 11 N.Y.2d 702
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 25, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 N.E.2d 919 (Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp., 180 N.E.2d 919, 11 N.Y.2d 702 (N.Y. 1962).

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that no actionable negligence was proved against appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
124 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 N.E.2d 919, 11 N.Y.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barcellos-v-triboro-coach-corp-ny-1962.