Barbour v. Western Regional Director

Fourth Circuit

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

324 F. App'x 282

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2009·No. No. 08-8544·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Edward Barbour appeals the district court’s order consolidating his eight 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints and dismissing them without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1) [283] (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Barbour v. Western Reg’l Dir., No. 7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU, 2008 WL 5062126 (W.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Edward Barbour appeals the district court’s order consolidating his eight 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints and dismissing them without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1) [283] (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Barbour v. Western Reg’l Dir., No. 7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU, 2008 WL 5062126 (W.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barbour v. Western Regional Director, 324 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

324 F. App'x 282 (Barbour v. Western Regional Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related