Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
264 A.D. 824, 35 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 6, 1942
StatusPublished
This text of 264 A.D. 824 (Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 264 A.D. 824, 35 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
Opinion
—• Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to resettle a previous order which denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint in a silicosis action.) Present —• Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 824, 35 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbour-v-kimberly-clark-corp-nyappdiv-1942.