Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

264 A.D. 824, 35 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854

Opinion

—• Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to resettle a previous order which denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint in a silicosis action.) Present —• Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 264 A.D. 824, 35 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

264 A.D. 824 (Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.